psychopathology/ponerology

View previous topic View next topic Go down

psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:43 pm

Podcast: Play in new window | Download



British scholar and researcher Clive Boddy, author of Corporate Psychopaths: Organizational Destroyers joins us to discuss his recent article, “The Corporate Psychopaths Theory of the Global Financial Crisis.” We discuss corporate psychopathy, its identification and its ramifications.

http://www.corbettreport.com/interview-423-clive-boddy/
avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

the Corporation: a psychopath

Post by zone on Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:49 pm



THE CORPORATION [1/23] What is a Corporation?

1. The Corporation is today's dominant institution, creating great wealth but also great harm. This 26 award-winning documentary examines the nature, evolution, impacts and future of the modern business corporation and the increasing role it plays in society and our everyday lives.



THE CORPORATION [6/23] The Pathology of Commerce

6. If we look at the corporation as a legal person, it exhibits all the characteristics of a psychopath using a personality diagnostic checklist by the World Health Organization.
avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:51 pm

http://ponerology.com/

NEW: Political Ponerology is now available in German (preview here) from Pilule Rouge

REVIEWS AND ENDORSEMENTS
"This is an extraordinary book."


Ilan Pappe, author of The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
"Political Ponerology is fascinating, essential reading."


Philip Zimbardo, author of The Lucifer Effect
For more reviews and endorsements of Political Ponerology, click here.

PONEROLOGY: THE STUDY OF EVIL
In the author’s opinion, Ponerology reveals itself to be a new branch of science born out of historical need and the most recent accomplishments of medicine and psychology. In light of objective naturalistic language, it studies the causal components and processes of the genesis of evil, regardless of the latter’s social scope. We may attempt to analyze these ponerogenic processes which have given rise to human injustice, armed with proper knowledge, particularly in the area of psychopathology. Again and again, as the reader will discover, in such a study, we meet with the effects of pathological factors whose carriers are people characterized by some degree of various psychological deviations or defects.” (Lobaczewski, 42)

avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The Zionist devil’s advocate

Post by zone on Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:34 pm

The Zionist devil’s advocate

Alan Dershowitz’s defence of war crimes


By Gilad Atzmon

Ethnic cleansing advocate Alan Dershowitz is not at all happy. He is devastated by the failure of the media and the international community to distinguish between the Israeli military and “Hamas terrorists” (this is how he refers to Palestinian freedom fighters).

Last week, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz lent its pages to this Talmudic spin master – and I was delighted because Dershowitz’ arguments throw new light on the depths of Jewish ideological and political morbidity.

According to Dershowitz, “As Hamas continues to target Israeli civilians in their homes, Israel continues to target terrorist leaders and other legitimate military targets.”

It seems that Dershowitz has found the magic formula that distinguishes between the “Jew” and the gentile in this conflict. The Jew is always a “civilian” who happens to be a “victim”, while the dozens of babies, children and women murdered by Israel in Gaza last week must have been “terrorist leaders”.

…Dershowitz has found the magic formula that distinguishes between the “Jew” and the gentile in this conflict. The Jew is always a “civilian” who happens to be a “victim”, while the dozens of babies, children and women murdered by Israel in Gaza last week must have been “terrorist leaders”.

Dershowitz argues that Hamas’s policy is “designed to sow terror among the Israeli population”.

This is a peculiar argument. Because of its limited means, Hamas is confined to the use of primitive rockets. If Hamas had cruise missiles at its disposal and still used them to target civilians, then I would be the first to agree with Dershowitz and even support his argument. But the reverse is true: it is the Israeli armed forces that possess the most sophisticated weaponry and are capable of targeting military targets with precise, even astonishing accuracy. So, with that in mind, every Palestinian civilian casualty caused by the Jewish state must be counted as an Israeli attempt at massacre and therefore nothing short of a vile war crime.

Dershowitz justifies Israeli barbarism by pointing at Article 51 of the United Nations Charter that clearly refers to the “right of self-defence”.

But the Harvard spin doctor forgot to mention that the Gazans are actually living under Israeli occupation in what amounts to an Israeli army-controlled concentration camp. As such, it is the people of Gaza’s right to resist that is clearly protected by international law.

I have shown on numerous occasions that the Jewish ethnic campaigner Dershowitz is no Jewish sage and that his advocacy of mass murder is very problematic. Dershowitz clumsily falls into traps he himself foolishly sets. “What would Egypt do if Hamas or Islamic Jihad suddenly began to lob deadly shells in the direction of Cairo suburbs? What would any country do?” says this Zionist mouthpiece.

Would Dershowitz be … outraged if he had found that, back in the Spring of 1944, a bunch of heroic, militant Jewish Auschwitz inmates had managed to launch a few long-range missiles towards Berlin? Would Dershowitz see them as “war criminals” attempting to murder German civilians?

Let’s just examine his hasbara (Israeli propaganda) logic. Would Dershowitz be similarly outraged if he had found that, back in the Spring of 1944, a bunch of heroic, militant Jewish Auschwitz inmates had managed to launch a few long-range missiles towards Berlin? Would Dershowitz see them as “war criminals” attempting to murder German civilians? Would Dershowitz support Hitler’s decision to unleash his wrath against those Jewish inmates and their “terrorist” militant leaders? No, he would not because Dershowitz’ tribal ethics are, above all, flexible: he fiddles around with his arguments hoping that no one will read him carefully enough to notice.

Dershowitz says: “There are some who argue that all targeted assassination is unlawful, since it constitutes ‘extrajudicial killing’. But all military deaths are extrajudicial killings, as are deaths caused in the civilian context by individual acts of self-defence or by the police shooting a dangerous fleeing felon.”

Someone should remind dear old Dershowitz that Palestinian militants are living and operating within an Israeli-controlled open-air prison. This means that the Israeli army is operating as a police force and its first duty is to attempt to bring the so-called “criminals” to trial. The attempt to equate Hamas leaders with “fleeing felons” is pathetic, for Hamas was democratically elected by the Palestinian people. Furthermore, neither Israel nor the USA, Britain or any state I can think of would deploy a F-16 warplanes against any “fleeing felons”. If Israel really insists on exercising its judicial power, it should send police forces into Gaza to capture those it regards as a threat – and then charge them in court.

Israel starves, abuses and, when it deems it necessary, murders its occupied population. Israel is obviously a criminal state, its leaders are war criminals and their enthusiastic advocate Dershowitz is the ultimate embodiment of Zionist filth.

According to Dershowitz, “Israel’s response to the Hamas rockets must of course be proportional, but proportionality does not require that Israel wait until a large number of its civilians are actually killed or seriously injured. Israel’s response must be proportionate to the threat faced by its civilian population.”

Thus Dershowitz manages to empty the notion of proportionality of any meaning at all. Would Dershowitz also argue that we equally pursue the leaders of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) for pushing America into war with Iran? Clearly, such a conflict could escalate into world war – should we wait until a large proportion of humanity is reduced to dust?

Dershowitz says: “It is the obligation of every sovereign state, first and foremost, to protect its civilian population from terrorist attacks.”

I thought that, according to the Geneva Conventions, an occupying force is responsible for the protection of the civilian population living within the occupied territory. Israel starves, abuses and, when it deems it necessary, murders its occupied population. Israel is obviously a criminal state, its leaders are war criminals and their enthusiastic advocate Dershowitz is the ultimate embodiment of Zionist filth.

The fact that Dershowitz holds a podium at Harvard is just one more manifestation of the devastating transformation of American academia into one extended Yeshiva.

http://www.redressonline.com/2012/11/the-zionist-devils-advocate/
avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:38 pm

zone wrote:
Last week, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz lent its pages to this Talmudic spin master – and I was delighted because Dershowitz’ arguments throw new light on the depths of Jewish ideological and political morbidity.

Israel's right to self-defense against Hamas

The media and international community's failure to distinguish between the Israeli military and Hamas terrorists is not only immoral but encourages terrorism and erodes the basic principles of just warfare.

By Alan M. Dershowitz
| 05:04 18.11.12 | 99

THIS STORY IS BY
Alan M. Dershowitz
RELATED TAGS
anti-Israel
Hamas
Israel occupation

As Hamas continues to target Israeli civilians in their homes, Israel continues to target terrorist leaders and other legitimate military targets. Hamas has now succeeded in killing a family of three in their home. Targeting civilians, such as that family,...

The full text is available for subscribers & registered users.

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/israel-s-right-to-self-defense-against-hamas.premium-1.478627
avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:40 pm

avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:41 pm

avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:42 pm

avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:44 pm

Genocide Advocated by the Talmud

Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog ("Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed").

This passage is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, "Gentile," (p. 617).

This original Talmud passage has been concealed in translation. The Jewish Encyclopedia states that, "...in the various versions the reading has been altered, 'The best among the Egyptians' being generally substituted." In the Soncino version: "the best of the heathens" (Minor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b].

Israelis annually take part in a national pilgrimage to the grave of Simon ben Yohai, to honor this rabbi who advocated the extermination of non-Jews. (Jewish Press, June 9, 1989, p. 56B).

On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer Baruch Goldstein, an orthodox Jew from Brooklyn, massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children, while they knelt in prayer in a mosque. Goldstein was a disciple of the late Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane, who told CBS News that his teaching that Arabs are "dogs" is derived "from the Talmud." (CBS 60 Minutes, "Kahane").

University of Jerusalem Prof. Ehud Sprinzak described Kahane and Goldstein's philosophy: "They believe it's God's will that they commit violence against goyim, a Hebrew term for non-Jews." (NY Daily News, Feb. 26, 1994, p. 5).

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, "We have to recognize that Jewish blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing." (NY Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).

Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6).

Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human

The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam. Here are some of the Talmud passages which relate to this topic.

Kerithoth 6b: Uses of Oil of Anointing. "Our Rabbis have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over gentiles (goyim) or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: "Upon the flesh of man (Adam), shall it not be poured (Exodus 30:32]); and cattle and vessels are not man (Adam).

"Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse and not a man (Adam). But why is one exempt in the case of gentiles (goyim); are they not in the category of man (Adam)? No, it is written: 'And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are man" (Adam); [Ezekiel 34:31]: Ye are called man (Adam) but gentiles (goyim) are not called man (Adam)."
avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by zone on Thu Nov 22, 2012 10:46 pm

avatar
zone
Mod
Mod

Posts : 3653
Gender : Female Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: psychopathology/ponerology

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum