Huxley's Brave New World
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Huxley's Brave New World
And it seems to me perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing … a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods."
- Aldous Huxley
(Dear Lord, My God: judge and restrain this evil, in Jesus' Name.)
Scientists warn future drugs will be designed to control human mind
Ethan A. Huff
NaturalNews
April 15, 2011
It may sound like something out of a science fiction plot, but Oxford researchers say that modern conventional medicine is gradually developing ways to change the moral states of humans through pharmaceutical drugs, and thus control the way people think and act in various life situations. These new drugs will literally have the ability to disrupt an individual’s personal morality, and instead reprogram that person to believe and do whatever the drug designer has created that drug to do.
“Science has ignored the question of moral improvement so far, but it is now becoming a big debate,” said Dr. Guy Kahane from the Oxford Centre for Neuroethics in the UK. “There is already a growing body of research you can describe in these terms. Studies show that certain drugs affect the ways people respond to moral dilemmas by increasing their sense of empathy, group affiliation and by reducing aggression.”
While this may sound good in theory, mind control is already a very dangerous side effect of existing drugs. Take the antidepressant drug Prozac, for instance, which has been known to cause those taking it to lash out in violent rages. One young boy murdered his father by beating him and stabbing him in the head, and hit his mother with a crowbar and stabbed her in the face, shortly after starting to take Prozac.
But the kinds of drugs Kahane and his colleagues are referring to imply designer drugs specifically designed to not only alter one’s mental state, but also to change the way that person thinks about situations from a moral perspective. The end result is literally a type of drug-induced mind control where human subjects will be controlled by someone else, and unable to make conscious decisions for themselves.
Research on the subject, of course, tries to paint the idea of mind-control drugs in a positive light, suggesting that they could be used to help make the world a better place. Just imagine less violence, more trust, and more love, they say. This rhetoric, though, is really just a ploy to further numb the already mind-numbed masses into accepting the idea as a good thing.
http://www.infowars.com/scientists-warn-future-drugs-will-be-designed-to-control-human-mind/
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
Can anyone escape their sorcery's?
Or will it just be a case of not being deceived by their sorcery's?
All that training I had when I was a young man may come in useful after all.
Or will it just be a case of not being deceived by their sorcery's?
All that training I had when I was a young man may come in useful after all.
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
“Science has ignored the question of moral improvement so far, but it is now becoming a big debate,” said Dr. Guy Kahane from the Oxford Centre for Neuroethics in the UK.
But the kinds of drugs Kahane and his colleagues are referring to imply designer drugs specifically designed to not only alter one’s mental state, but also to change the way that person thinks about situations from a moral perspective. The end result is literally a type of drug-induced mind control where human subjects will be controlled by someone else, and unable to make conscious decisions for themselves.
http://www.infowars.com/scientists-warn-future-drugs-will-be-designed-to-control-human-mind/
GUY KAHANE:
Closing remarks were delivered by Dr. Guy Kahane, deputy director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics within the Faculty of Philosophy. Dr. Kahane said that he appreciated how the teachings of Judaism of thousands of years can be used for offering clarity and views pertaining to ethical issues regarding cutting edge scientific technology in today’s society."
..............
World’s leading expert on Jewish medical ethics, Professor Avraham Steinberg, speaks at Oxford Chabad Society
Oxford Chabad Society collaborated this week with the Ethox Centre, a bioethics research centre in the University of Oxford’s Department of Public Health, to host a high profile lecture by the world’s leading expert on Jewish medical ethics, Professor Avraham Steinberg, at the David Slager Jewish student centre.
Professor Steinberg, an Israel Prize Laureate and author of the acclaimed Encyclopaedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, spoke to about 50 people on the Jewish perspectives regarding some of the most cutting edge scientific implementations in the field of medicine today, including stem cell research, pre-implantation genetic diagnoses (PGD), gender selection and human enhancement.
In a lecture outlining the scientific process of Stem Cell research, he explained that some of the most controversial issues in medical ethics today hinge on the debate on the definition of beginning of life. He explained that birth is the ultimate and universally accepted definition of the beginning of life. However, there could be numerous possible stages in the development of the fetus when one can define the beginning of life, starting with conception. If life begins at conception, as some religions believe, then the mixing of the sperm with the egg creating a blastocyst (early embryo) constitutes a life and may therefore not be destroyed even in order to save a life.
He pointed out, however, the Jewish view is there is not a single point during fetal development when life begins but rather it progresses gradually in a process that endows the embryo with more and more rights until birth when it becomes a full human being. Prof. Steinberg maintains that, based on an interesting dialogue in the Talmud, ensoulment per se is also not a relevant issue in Judaism regarding ethics.
He thus explained that the Jewish view on stem cell research is generally permissive, since an embryo in such an early stage of development (4-5 days post conception) does not represent a human being, and therefore does not constitute the killing of one life to save another, which would be categorically prohibited in Judaism. Moreover, Judaism distinguishes between an embryo who is in the womb of a woman vs an embryo in a lab dish outside a womb. The latter certainly is not defined as a human being since he requires an additional act (transplantation into a womb) before even having the potential chance to develop into a human being.
Currently there are millions of frozen fertilised eggs world-wide who no one is claiming, and which have no chance whatsoever to ever become a human being.
Explaining the important of Jewish medical ethics today, Professor Steinberg made it clear that, in his view, despite his scientific background, the definition of life is not a scientific issue and therefore science can not solve this problem. It is primarily a moral and religious issue that depends on the cultural or religious background one comes from. Judaism therefore has a profound voice in this debate.
Regarding, the terminology ‘playing G-d’, he refuted it as an issue in Jewish medical ethics. The term ‘playing G-d’ only refers to an action ex-nihilo, bringing something into existence from nothing. This is something humans are unable to do and is indeed relegated to G-d. What human beings can do is to take something that exists and change its form or enhance it. When man builds a table, for example, this is what one is doing, taking wood and forming a table. Or when treating pneumonia with antibiotics or transplanting a new organ to a patient – these are permissible human acts, using the intelligence that G-d gave human beings to improve the well-being of Man.
The same thing is, from a Jewish point of view, when taking existing sperm and egg from a couple who exist and create an embryo through IVF treatment. It is human beings acting in their remit, as long as it is done for the betterment of humankind.
Prof. Steinberg, who serves as senior paediatric neurologist at Shaare Tzedek Hospital, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said proudly that his department has assisted the birth of over a hundred healthy children through IVF and PGD to families with very serious genetic diseases.
Furthermore, he revealed, his department allowed for the formation of an embryo through IVF allowing for the birth of a child in order to provide a bone marrow transplant to save the life of a sibling.
He indicated that this might be viewed as controversial because not much research has been done on the impact on such a child who was born only in order to save someone else’s life.
Prof. Stenberg, however, justified this procedure by suggesting that he hoped that not only would the child not be loved less than an ordinary child, but much more since he had been an essential medium that saved the life of their other child.
Prof. Steinberg pointed out some ethical dilemmas that have emerged due the availability of the PGD technology: Sex selection, late-onset diseases, choosing physical and behavioural characters and others.
The event was chaired by Rabbi Eli Brackman, director of the Oxford Chabad Society, who has been pioneering the study of Jewish medical ethics with students at the University of Oxford over the last few years, as part of the Oxford Chabad Society programme of lectures in Oxford. Rabbi Brackman mentioned that Judaism has an important contribution to make to the rapidly developing area of medical ethics and hopes this event will pave the way for further integrating Jewish medical ethics at institutions like Oxford and around the UK.
Introductions were given by an impressive line-up of academics and experts on practical ethics at the University of Oxford. The first introduction was given by Charles Foster, Fellow of Green Templeton College, Oxford and Research Associate at the Ethox Centre, University of Oxford. Mr. Foster, who was instrumental in the collaboration of the Chabad Society with the Ethox Centre for this event, is a barrister who practices almost exclusively in medical law and has held research positions in anaesthesia and comparative anatomy. He was also a fellow at the Faculty of Law, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, and research assistant to Aharon Barak, former President of the Supreme Court of Israel.
He acknowledged the contribution of Jewish medical ethics to his own thinking and writing, noting that modern academic progress often involves or consists of disinterring ancient and forgotten truths. 'For me,' he said, 'Jewish philosophy has often been the key that has opened the door to rooms full of great intellectual treasures.' He commented that one of the many important bequests of Jewish medical ethics has been to expose the folly of medical atomism - treating the patient as an entity unconnected to the nexus of relationships in which he exists. 'Modern medicine increasingly recognises that proper diagnosis is diagnosis of the relational ills that afflict the patient, and that proper treatment is treatment not just of the patient but of the entire context in which the patient exists. These things are heralded as revolutionary, yet halacha has known them for millennia.'
An introduction was also given by Prof. Julian Savulescu, a recognised world leader in practical ethics, who holds the Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford and Director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics within the Faculty of Philosophy.
Closing remarks were delivered by Dr. Guy Kahane, deputy director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics within the Faculty of Philosophy. Dr. Kahane said that he appreciated how the teachings of Judaism of thousands of years can be used for offering clarity and views pertaining to ethical issues regarding cutting edge scientific technology in today’s society.
http://www.oxfordchabad.org/templates/articlecco_cdo/aid/1223543/jewish/Professor-Abraham-Steinberg.htm
THIS IS REALLY STARTING TO PISS ME OFF.
take a good look at this VIPER: they AIM TO DESTROY US
http://www.oxfordchabad.org/templates/articlecco_cdo/aid/1223543/jewish/Professor-Abraham-Steinberg.htm
But the kinds of drugs Kahane and his colleagues are referring to imply designer drugs specifically designed to not only alter one’s mental state, but also to change the way that person thinks about situations from a moral perspective. The end result is literally a type of drug-induced mind control where human subjects will be controlled by someone else, and unable to make conscious decisions for themselves.
http://www.infowars.com/scientists-warn-future-drugs-will-be-designed-to-control-human-mind/
GUY KAHANE:
Closing remarks were delivered by Dr. Guy Kahane, deputy director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics within the Faculty of Philosophy. Dr. Kahane said that he appreciated how the teachings of Judaism of thousands of years can be used for offering clarity and views pertaining to ethical issues regarding cutting edge scientific technology in today’s society."
..............
World’s leading expert on Jewish medical ethics, Professor Avraham Steinberg, speaks at Oxford Chabad Society
Oxford Chabad Society collaborated this week with the Ethox Centre, a bioethics research centre in the University of Oxford’s Department of Public Health, to host a high profile lecture by the world’s leading expert on Jewish medical ethics, Professor Avraham Steinberg, at the David Slager Jewish student centre.
Professor Steinberg, an Israel Prize Laureate and author of the acclaimed Encyclopaedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, spoke to about 50 people on the Jewish perspectives regarding some of the most cutting edge scientific implementations in the field of medicine today, including stem cell research, pre-implantation genetic diagnoses (PGD), gender selection and human enhancement.
In a lecture outlining the scientific process of Stem Cell research, he explained that some of the most controversial issues in medical ethics today hinge on the debate on the definition of beginning of life. He explained that birth is the ultimate and universally accepted definition of the beginning of life. However, there could be numerous possible stages in the development of the fetus when one can define the beginning of life, starting with conception. If life begins at conception, as some religions believe, then the mixing of the sperm with the egg creating a blastocyst (early embryo) constitutes a life and may therefore not be destroyed even in order to save a life.
He pointed out, however, the Jewish view is there is not a single point during fetal development when life begins but rather it progresses gradually in a process that endows the embryo with more and more rights until birth when it becomes a full human being. Prof. Steinberg maintains that, based on an interesting dialogue in the Talmud, ensoulment per se is also not a relevant issue in Judaism regarding ethics.
He thus explained that the Jewish view on stem cell research is generally permissive, since an embryo in such an early stage of development (4-5 days post conception) does not represent a human being, and therefore does not constitute the killing of one life to save another, which would be categorically prohibited in Judaism. Moreover, Judaism distinguishes between an embryo who is in the womb of a woman vs an embryo in a lab dish outside a womb. The latter certainly is not defined as a human being since he requires an additional act (transplantation into a womb) before even having the potential chance to develop into a human being.
Currently there are millions of frozen fertilised eggs world-wide who no one is claiming, and which have no chance whatsoever to ever become a human being.
Explaining the important of Jewish medical ethics today, Professor Steinberg made it clear that, in his view, despite his scientific background, the definition of life is not a scientific issue and therefore science can not solve this problem. It is primarily a moral and religious issue that depends on the cultural or religious background one comes from. Judaism therefore has a profound voice in this debate.
Regarding, the terminology ‘playing G-d’, he refuted it as an issue in Jewish medical ethics. The term ‘playing G-d’ only refers to an action ex-nihilo, bringing something into existence from nothing. This is something humans are unable to do and is indeed relegated to G-d. What human beings can do is to take something that exists and change its form or enhance it. When man builds a table, for example, this is what one is doing, taking wood and forming a table. Or when treating pneumonia with antibiotics or transplanting a new organ to a patient – these are permissible human acts, using the intelligence that G-d gave human beings to improve the well-being of Man.
The same thing is, from a Jewish point of view, when taking existing sperm and egg from a couple who exist and create an embryo through IVF treatment. It is human beings acting in their remit, as long as it is done for the betterment of humankind.
Prof. Steinberg, who serves as senior paediatric neurologist at Shaare Tzedek Hospital, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said proudly that his department has assisted the birth of over a hundred healthy children through IVF and PGD to families with very serious genetic diseases.
Furthermore, he revealed, his department allowed for the formation of an embryo through IVF allowing for the birth of a child in order to provide a bone marrow transplant to save the life of a sibling.
He indicated that this might be viewed as controversial because not much research has been done on the impact on such a child who was born only in order to save someone else’s life.
Prof. Stenberg, however, justified this procedure by suggesting that he hoped that not only would the child not be loved less than an ordinary child, but much more since he had been an essential medium that saved the life of their other child.
Prof. Steinberg pointed out some ethical dilemmas that have emerged due the availability of the PGD technology: Sex selection, late-onset diseases, choosing physical and behavioural characters and others.
The event was chaired by Rabbi Eli Brackman, director of the Oxford Chabad Society, who has been pioneering the study of Jewish medical ethics with students at the University of Oxford over the last few years, as part of the Oxford Chabad Society programme of lectures in Oxford. Rabbi Brackman mentioned that Judaism has an important contribution to make to the rapidly developing area of medical ethics and hopes this event will pave the way for further integrating Jewish medical ethics at institutions like Oxford and around the UK.
Introductions were given by an impressive line-up of academics and experts on practical ethics at the University of Oxford. The first introduction was given by Charles Foster, Fellow of Green Templeton College, Oxford and Research Associate at the Ethox Centre, University of Oxford. Mr. Foster, who was instrumental in the collaboration of the Chabad Society with the Ethox Centre for this event, is a barrister who practices almost exclusively in medical law and has held research positions in anaesthesia and comparative anatomy. He was also a fellow at the Faculty of Law, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, and research assistant to Aharon Barak, former President of the Supreme Court of Israel.
He acknowledged the contribution of Jewish medical ethics to his own thinking and writing, noting that modern academic progress often involves or consists of disinterring ancient and forgotten truths. 'For me,' he said, 'Jewish philosophy has often been the key that has opened the door to rooms full of great intellectual treasures.' He commented that one of the many important bequests of Jewish medical ethics has been to expose the folly of medical atomism - treating the patient as an entity unconnected to the nexus of relationships in which he exists. 'Modern medicine increasingly recognises that proper diagnosis is diagnosis of the relational ills that afflict the patient, and that proper treatment is treatment not just of the patient but of the entire context in which the patient exists. These things are heralded as revolutionary, yet halacha has known them for millennia.'
An introduction was also given by Prof. Julian Savulescu, a recognised world leader in practical ethics, who holds the Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford and Director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics within the Faculty of Philosophy.
Closing remarks were delivered by Dr. Guy Kahane, deputy director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics within the Faculty of Philosophy. Dr. Kahane said that he appreciated how the teachings of Judaism of thousands of years can be used for offering clarity and views pertaining to ethical issues regarding cutting edge scientific technology in today’s society.
http://www.oxfordchabad.org/templates/articlecco_cdo/aid/1223543/jewish/Professor-Abraham-Steinberg.htm
THIS IS REALLY STARTING TO PISS ME OFF.
take a good look at this VIPER: they AIM TO DESTROY US
http://www.oxfordchabad.org/templates/articlecco_cdo/aid/1223543/jewish/Professor-Abraham-Steinberg.htm
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
“Science has ignored the question of moral improvement so far, but it is now becoming a big debate,” said Dr. Guy Kahane from the Oxford Centre for Neuroethics in the UK.
But the kinds of drugs Kahane and his colleagues are referring to imply designer drugs specifically designed to not only alter one’s mental state, but also to change the way that person thinks about situations from a moral perspective. The end result is literally a type of drug-induced mind control where human subjects will be controlled by someone else, and unable to make conscious decisions for themselves.
Oh so BUSTED!
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
Strangelove wrote:Can anyone escape their sorcery's?
Or will it just be a case of not being deceived by their sorcery's?
All that training I had when I was a young man may come in useful after all.
elaborate please (in the ssshhhh section or text me)
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
“When the conspirators get ready to take over the United States they will use
fluoridated water and vaccines to change people’s attitudes and loyalties and make
them docile, apathetic, unconcerned and groggy. According to their own writings and
the means they have already confessedly employed, the conspirators have deliberately
planned and developed methods to mentally deteriorate, morally debase, and
completely enslave the masses. They will prepare vaccines containing drugs that will
completely change people. Secret Communist plans for conquering America were
adopted in 1914 and published in 1953. These plans called for compulsory
vaccination with vaccines containing change agent drugs. They also plan on using
disease germs, fluoridation and vaccinations to weaken the people and reduce the
population.”
– Impact of Science on Society, by Bertrand Russell
fluoridated water and vaccines to change people’s attitudes and loyalties and make
them docile, apathetic, unconcerned and groggy. According to their own writings and
the means they have already confessedly employed, the conspirators have deliberately
planned and developed methods to mentally deteriorate, morally debase, and
completely enslave the masses. They will prepare vaccines containing drugs that will
completely change people. Secret Communist plans for conquering America were
adopted in 1914 and published in 1953. These plans called for compulsory
vaccination with vaccines containing change agent drugs. They also plan on using
disease germs, fluoridation and vaccinations to weaken the people and reduce the
population.”
– Impact of Science on Society, by Bertrand Russell
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
Strangelove wrote:“When the conspirators get ready to take over the United States they will usefluoridated water and vaccines to change people’s attitudes and loyalties and makethem docile, apathetic, unconcerned and groggy. According to their own writings andthe means they have already confessedly employed, the conspirators have deliberately
planned and developed methods to mentally deteriorate, morally debase, and
completely enslave the masses. They will prepare vaccines containing drugsthat willcompletely change people. Secret Communist plans for conquering America wereadopted in 1914 and published in 1953. These plans called for compulsoryvaccination with vaccines containing change agent drugs. They also plan on usingdisease germs, fluoridation and vaccinations to weaken the people and reduce thepopulation.”
– Impact of Science on Society, by Bertrand Russell
mission accomplished?
COMMUNISM
https://christian-wilderness.forumvi.com/t54-communism
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
Aldous Huxley -The Ultimate Revolution- UCLA - Berkeley - 20 Mar 1962.mp3 (10.1 MB) (Modified: Jun 10 2008 03:56:06 PM)
this is the "they'll love their servitude through pharmacological poisoning" speech. done deal.
flouride and vaccinations and the people haven't had the energy for a real revolt since.
not that i believe in revolution or rebellion as a Christian. but this is how they managed to control the masses.
stalin only needed 1/4 the guard-power after using flouride on the prisoners.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=&sort=date&order=desc
this is the "they'll love their servitude through pharmacological poisoning" speech. done deal.
flouride and vaccinations and the people haven't had the energy for a real revolt since.
not that i believe in revolution or rebellion as a Christian. but this is how they managed to control the masses.
stalin only needed 1/4 the guard-power after using flouride on the prisoners.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=&sort=date&order=desc
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Aussies: Big Brother Super-Regulator
March 3, 2012
New Free Speech Campaign Launched
You would all know by now that Mr. Ray Finkelstein QC, a left-wing former Federal Court Judge with no media experience, issued a 400 page report for the Gillard Government which calls for a Big Brother Super-Regulator to 'regulate' political speech and - among other things - impose new laws to stop Australians from speaking up.
Its “recommendations” should sicken every single Australian: They actually call for a Big Brother Super-Regulator to censor not just the newspapers and TV, but websites, personal blogs, and even what you say on Twitter!
This is a proposal that would seem right at home in North Korea or Zibmabwe. I never thought – as dark as things seemed- we could stoop this low here in Australia.
The size and scope of the proposed Super-Regulator is breathtaking. They will have the power to impose a “code of ethics”, force you to print views you don’t agree with as part of a ‘right of reply’, take you to court, and even make you take pieces down! Even personal blogs that get only 40 hits a day will be covered! To make matters worse, the SuperRegulator "would not have to give reasons for its decisions" and the decisions "would not be subject to appeal." Even climate change websites in other countries like Watt’s Up With That will be coved by this!
This is not a matter of partisan politics. If you are left wing or right wing, you should take action against this horror.
We need to speak out now – while we are still allowed.
This is why we just created www.FreeSpeechAustralia.com so we can work together to help stop this nightmare from becoming a reality.
It includes an online petition, which I STRONGLY urge you all to sign and to pass onto all your family and friends, as well as an “Action Centre” detailing what other activities you can take, a resource toolkit, and links to a Facebook page and Twitter account.
Australia is already behind countries like, Niger, Mali, Slovakia, Namibia and Poland in the Index of Media Freedom. If this is passed, we will be joining North Korea, Cuba, and Zimbabwe.....
http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2012/03/new-free-speech-campaign-launched.html
New Free Speech Campaign Launched
You would all know by now that Mr. Ray Finkelstein QC, a left-wing former Federal Court Judge with no media experience, issued a 400 page report for the Gillard Government which calls for a Big Brother Super-Regulator to 'regulate' political speech and - among other things - impose new laws to stop Australians from speaking up.
Its “recommendations” should sicken every single Australian: They actually call for a Big Brother Super-Regulator to censor not just the newspapers and TV, but websites, personal blogs, and even what you say on Twitter!
This is a proposal that would seem right at home in North Korea or Zibmabwe. I never thought – as dark as things seemed- we could stoop this low here in Australia.
The size and scope of the proposed Super-Regulator is breathtaking. They will have the power to impose a “code of ethics”, force you to print views you don’t agree with as part of a ‘right of reply’, take you to court, and even make you take pieces down! Even personal blogs that get only 40 hits a day will be covered! To make matters worse, the SuperRegulator "would not have to give reasons for its decisions" and the decisions "would not be subject to appeal." Even climate change websites in other countries like Watt’s Up With That will be coved by this!
This is not a matter of partisan politics. If you are left wing or right wing, you should take action against this horror.
We need to speak out now – while we are still allowed.
This is why we just created www.FreeSpeechAustralia.com so we can work together to help stop this nightmare from becoming a reality.
It includes an online petition, which I STRONGLY urge you all to sign and to pass onto all your family and friends, as well as an “Action Centre” detailing what other activities you can take, a resource toolkit, and links to a Facebook page and Twitter account.
Australia is already behind countries like, Niger, Mali, Slovakia, Namibia and Poland in the Index of Media Freedom. If this is passed, we will be joining North Korea, Cuba, and Zimbabwe.....
http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2012/03/new-free-speech-campaign-launched.html
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Julian Huxley on UNESCO
UNESCO: Its purpose and Its Philosophyhttp://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/julian-huxley.htmby Julian Huxley, First Director-General of UNESCO
(Washington DC: Public Affairs Press, 1947)
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
UNESCO: Its purpose and Its Philosophy
by Julian Huxley, First Director-General of UNESCO
(Washington DC: Public Affairs Press, 1947)
Skip down to The Synthesis of opposites & Teilhard deChardin's Cosmic Evolution
Quotes and Excerpts
"Unesco [UN Educational, Social and Scientific Organization] also can and should promote the growth of international contacts, international organizations, and actual international achievements, which will offer increasing resistance to the forces making for division and conflict. In particular, it can both on its own and in close relation with other UN agencies such as the FAO [Food & Agriculture Organization] and WHO [World Health Organization], promote the international application of science to human welfare. As the benefits of such world-scale collaboration becomes plain (which will be speedily be the case in relation to the food and health of mankind) it will become increasingly more difficult for any nation to destroy them by resorting to isolationism or to war." Page 14. [See The UN Plan for Food and Land]
this is pretty straight forward if we keep in mind this guy is hardcore eugenicist/technocrat. he's saying the greater good is killing off us useless sheeple.
he's saying unesco will implement global compliance to the NWO agenda which is extermination of all the undesirables, and a breeding programme for the herd...so they can have pliable effective servant creatures in every area (cops/etc).
they (huxleys rockefellers etc) stay "wild" meaning unmodified and GMO'd cuz they're the fittest that gotta run things.o kool.
no wonder God is destroying the earth and giving His people a new one. this one's hopelessly evil and got to go.
"Further, since the world today is in process of becoming one, and since a major aim of Unesco must be to help in the speedy and satisfactory realization of this process... Unesco must pay special attention to international education - to education as a function of a world society, in addition to its function in relation to national societies, to regional or religious or intellectual groups or to local communities." p. 29-30
unesco must control all thinking. they must control all movement.
"The fact has also been emphasized by the development of intelligence testing, some authorities in this field going so far as to assert that only 10-20% of the population are capable of profiting by a university course." p. 29-32
a-a-a-a-and there you go. some 'expert" says we dont need skoolin cuz they need us dumb and compliant.
well.....i say GO FLY A KITE YOU INBRED CRACKPOTS. i'll keep my intellect and individuality and you can breed with your sister if you think you'll evolve faster.
what rubbish.
by Julian Huxley, First Director-General of UNESCO
(Washington DC: Public Affairs Press, 1947)
Skip down to The Synthesis of opposites & Teilhard deChardin's Cosmic Evolution
Quotes and Excerpts
"Unesco [UN Educational, Social and Scientific Organization] also can and should promote the growth of international contacts, international organizations, and actual international achievements, which will offer increasing resistance to the forces making for division and conflict. In particular, it can both on its own and in close relation with other UN agencies such as the FAO [Food & Agriculture Organization] and WHO [World Health Organization], promote the international application of science to human welfare. As the benefits of such world-scale collaboration becomes plain (which will be speedily be the case in relation to the food and health of mankind) it will become increasingly more difficult for any nation to destroy them by resorting to isolationism or to war." Page 14. [See The UN Plan for Food and Land]
this is pretty straight forward if we keep in mind this guy is hardcore eugenicist/technocrat. he's saying the greater good is killing off us useless sheeple.
he's saying unesco will implement global compliance to the NWO agenda which is extermination of all the undesirables, and a breeding programme for the herd...so they can have pliable effective servant creatures in every area (cops/etc).
they (huxleys rockefellers etc) stay "wild" meaning unmodified and GMO'd cuz they're the fittest that gotta run things.o kool.
no wonder God is destroying the earth and giving His people a new one. this one's hopelessly evil and got to go.
"Further, since the world today is in process of becoming one, and since a major aim of Unesco must be to help in the speedy and satisfactory realization of this process... Unesco must pay special attention to international education - to education as a function of a world society, in addition to its function in relation to national societies, to regional or religious or intellectual groups or to local communities." p. 29-30
unesco must control all thinking. they must control all movement.
"The fact has also been emphasized by the development of intelligence testing, some authorities in this field going so far as to assert that only 10-20% of the population are capable of profiting by a university course." p. 29-32
a-a-a-a-and there you go. some 'expert" says we dont need skoolin cuz they need us dumb and compliant.
well.....i say GO FLY A KITE YOU INBRED CRACKPOTS. i'll keep my intellect and individuality and you can breed with your sister if you think you'll evolve faster.
what rubbish.
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
"Conclusion: ...The task before UNESCO... is to help the emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas and with its own broad purpose. This is opportune, since this the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available and also the first time that man has had the means... of laying a world-wide foundation for the minimum physical welfare of the entire human species. And it is necessary, for at the moment, two opposing philosophies of life confront each other from the West and from the East....
"You may categorize the two philosophies as two super-nationalisms, or as individualism versus collectivism; or as the American versus the Russian way of life, or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believe not only that this can happen, but that, through the inexorable dialectic of evolution, it must happen....
"In pursuing this aim, we must eschew dogma - whether it be theological dogma or Marxist dogma.... East and West will not agree on a basis of the future if they merely hurl at each other the fixed ideas of the past. For that is what dogma's are -- the crystallizations of some dominant system of thought of a particular epoch. A dogma may of course crystallize tried and valid experience; but if it be dogma, it does so in a way which is rigid, uncompromising and intolerant.... If we are to achieve progress, we must learn to uncrystalize our dogmas." p. 61
"...society as such embodies no values comparable to those embodied in individuals; but individuals are meaningless except in relation to the community." p. 62
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/julian-huxley.htm
TRANSLATION: WE HATE JESUS CHRIST AND MUST DESTROY THAT RELIGION.
"You may categorize the two philosophies as two super-nationalisms, or as individualism versus collectivism; or as the American versus the Russian way of life, or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believe not only that this can happen, but that, through the inexorable dialectic of evolution, it must happen....
"In pursuing this aim, we must eschew dogma - whether it be theological dogma or Marxist dogma.... East and West will not agree on a basis of the future if they merely hurl at each other the fixed ideas of the past. For that is what dogma's are -- the crystallizations of some dominant system of thought of a particular epoch. A dogma may of course crystallize tried and valid experience; but if it be dogma, it does so in a way which is rigid, uncompromising and intolerant.... If we are to achieve progress, we must learn to uncrystalize our dogmas." p. 61
"...society as such embodies no values comparable to those embodied in individuals; but individuals are meaningless except in relation to the community." p. 62
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/julian-huxley.htm
TRANSLATION: WE HATE JESUS CHRIST AND MUST DESTROY THAT RELIGION.
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
zone wrote:TRANSLATION: WE HATE JESUS CHRIST AND MUST DESTROY THAT RELIGION.
yeah but....uhm.....they also wanna destroy marxism...so.....erm....I guess its ok?
Letter from Aldous Huxley to George Orwell
In the future, I’m right: Letter from Aldous Huxley to George Orwell over 1984 novel sheds light on their different ideas
By Rob King
UPDATED: 14:05 GMT, 7 March 2012
They were both critically acclaimed writers who were ahead of their time, creating imaginative visions of the future in their novels.
But an enlightening letter sent by Aldous Huxley to his fellow author George Orwell more than 60 years ago reveals that the two men had very different ideas of how the world would change.
Huxley's 1949 letter - the latest addition to a website that collects fascinating missives from the past - praises Orwell for the novel 1984, which offers a terrifying portrayal of a future totalitarian society.
Worlds apart: The novel 1984 by George Orwell, left, predicted a different world to that envisaged by Aldous Huxley, right
But the late California-based author - who had coincidentally taught Orwell more than three decades earlier - went on to focus on the differences between Orwell's vision and that revealed in his own masterpiece.
more...........
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2111440/Aldous-Huxley-letter-George-Orwell-1984-sheds-light-different-ideas.html#ixzz1pTzdgegl
...
By Rob King
UPDATED: 14:05 GMT, 7 March 2012
They were both critically acclaimed writers who were ahead of their time, creating imaginative visions of the future in their novels.
But an enlightening letter sent by Aldous Huxley to his fellow author George Orwell more than 60 years ago reveals that the two men had very different ideas of how the world would change.
Huxley's 1949 letter - the latest addition to a website that collects fascinating missives from the past - praises Orwell for the novel 1984, which offers a terrifying portrayal of a future totalitarian society.
Worlds apart: The novel 1984 by George Orwell, left, predicted a different world to that envisaged by Aldous Huxley, right
But the late California-based author - who had coincidentally taught Orwell more than three decades earlier - went on to focus on the differences between Orwell's vision and that revealed in his own masterpiece.
more...........
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2111440/Aldous-Huxley-letter-George-Orwell-1984-sheds-light-different-ideas.html#ixzz1pTzdgegl
...
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
'Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful.
'My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World'.
'Within the next generation I believe that the world's rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.'
- Aldous Huxley to George Orwell
I think he might be right.
'My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World'.
'Within the next generation I believe that the world's rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.'
- Aldous Huxley to George Orwell
I think he might be right.
Re: Huxley's Brave New World
Quantum dots control brain cells for the first time
"In an unlikely marriage of quantum physics and neuroscience, tiny particles called quantum dots have been used to control brain cells for the first time."
LINK: NEW SCIENTIST
......
Of course its all just to treat howwible diseases blah blah blah.....
"In an unlikely marriage of quantum physics and neuroscience, tiny particles called quantum dots have been used to control brain cells for the first time."
LINK: NEW SCIENTIST
......
Of course its all just to treat howwible diseases blah blah blah.....
DRONES slide show
http://cryptome.org/2012-info/drone-crew/drone-crew.htm
...
...
zone- Mod
- Posts : 3653
Gender : Location : In Christ
Join date : 2011-01-31
Similar topics
» New World Order
» End times = end of the world?
» Holocaustianity
» WORLD WAR 3 unfolding
» World Socialist Dictatorship
» End times = end of the world?
» Holocaustianity
» WORLD WAR 3 unfolding
» World Socialist Dictatorship
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum